- This is the first competencies taxonomy to be developed specifically for the space sector.
- It comprises about 250 competencies across five categories: traits, knowledge, technical skills, transferable skills, and qualifications.
- It was constructed through analysis of 812 early career UK space job adverts from SpaceCareers.uk.
- It is a work in progress and is not yet comprehensive. We will continue to develop it as we conduct further research into the workforce needs of the sector.
However, UK space companies are facing a skills shortage. 68% predict that they will be hiring over the next 3 years, but already more than half of large organisations report being worried about having access to skilled workers, and nearly 40% of all organisations say staff recruitment is a major barrier to their growth 1c.
Though there is a lot of anecdotal evidence of skills shortages in particular areas 3, there is very little detailed data available for the sector on the relative demand for different skills. Understanding exactly which competencies the sector is lacking is vital in informing provision of training and approaches to recruitment
A taxonomy of competencies supports the process of recruitment, and facilitates upskilling and reskilling. It provides a common vocabulary for alignment between education providers, employers, and employees, and a common frame of reference against which we can measure demand for competencies, what competencies the space workforce already has, and the impact that new training courses might have.
With this in mind, we have developed an initial space competencies taxonomy. It is based on analysis of job adverts and builds on previous work including the draft Space Engineering Technician standards. As is to be expected, it has strong crossovers with other skills taxonomies, both general (such as Nesta’s and the Skills Builer Framework) and specific (such as the SFIA’s). This taxonomy is based on the language used by employers, an important factor because it allows us to identify and measure the demand for skills.
It is the first competencies taxonomy to be developed specifically for the space sector. This is important because the space sector is unusual in many ways, including having the most highly qualified workforce of any sector, with 75% of workers holding at least a first degree 1a and having a segmented structure of upstream and downstream. A specialised taxonomy helps ensure that the specific workforce needs of the sector can be properly addressed.
The taxonomy we present here is a work in progress and is not yet comprehensive. We will continue to develop it as we conduct further research into the workforce needs of the sector.
Though the sector normally talks about ‘skills’ shortages, in the rest of this document we use the word ‘competencies’ instead so that we can talk about traits, knowledge, skills, and qualifications separately.
The taxonomy has a hierarchical structure with up to five levels.
First level: competency types
At the top level are five categories. These are comparable with other definitions such as Engineering UK’s five ‘components of employability’ 4 and the CBI’s definition of employability 5 and similar to the Civil Service Success Profiles Framework 6:
We define traits as features of a person’s character or personality, embodied by certain behaviours. They encompass what is typically described as ‘character’ in education contexts 78, as well as interests (such as interest in space) and personal preference (such as willingness to travel).
While they are distinct from transferable skills as they are about mindset and temperament, they should not be considered as innate or unlearnable. They can, in most cases, be learned, but are typically developed over a longer time period and at an earlier stage of development than transferable skills.
In conversation they would typically be prefixed with ‘You are’. Examples include: ‘responsible’, ‘hardworking’, and ‘willing to travel’.
We define knowledge as facts or information about a given topic. It is often difficult to separate knowledge from skills, and in these cases we usually err towards classifying things as skills.
In conversation knowledge would typically be prefixed with ‘You know about’ or ‘You have experience of’. Examples include: ‘Engineering standards’ and ‘STEM Principles’. Foreign languages are also classified as knowledge, separate from communication skills.
3. Technical skills
We define technical skills as skills which are specific to a sector or job.
In conversation they would typically be prefixed with ‘You can’ or ‘You have’. Examples include: ‘Use CAD software’ and ‘Contribute to technical reviews’.
4. Transferable skills
We define transferable skills as skills which can be applied in a similar way to most jobs, regardless of sector. Elsewhere they may be referred to as ‘essential skills’, ‘soft skills’, or ‘transversal skills'.
In conversation they would typically be prefixed with ‘You can’ or ‘You have’. Examples include: ‘Work in a team’ and ‘Attention to detail’.
We define qualifications as formal recognitions of certain knowledge or skills following an assessment process by a relevant body such as a college, university, or professional development organisation.
In conversation they would typically be prefixed with ‘You have’. Examples include: ‘Driving license’ and ‘PhD’.
Second level: thematic areas
At the second level are broad thematic areas such as ‘Science & Engineering’, ‘Programming & Computer Science’, and ‘Marketing & PR’.
Third level: competencies
At the third level are the specific competencies. For knowledge competencies, these are topics like ‘Orbital mechanics’; for skills competencies these are specific skills like ‘Perform spectroscopy’.
Fourth level and below: subcompetencies
The fourth and lower levels are for adding specificity to the competency definition. For example: Process and analyse data (L3 competency) > Geospatial data (L4 subcompetency) > GNSS data (L5 subcompetency). Many competencies do not have subcompetencies at present, but might do in future iterations of the taxonomy. They are particularly useful for specifying software packages (e.g. IT skills > MS Office > Excel).
Each item in the taxonomy has a unique classification code, similar to those used in the Dewey Decimal Classification system used by libraries.
Each code consists of a number of digits separated by decimal points. The first digit represents the first level of the hierarchy described above, and so on. For example, the code ‘220.127.116.11.1’ represents the following:
18.104.22.168.1 3 - Technical skills 2 - Programming & Computer Science 1 - Process and analyse data 1 - Geospatial data 1 - GNSS data
In this way we are able to be very specific when identifying competencies for jobs, whilst also getting a clear picture of the higher level competencies that are needed across the sector.
In addition to the taxonomy proper, we have identified certain groupings of competencies such as ‘European languages’ and ‘ESA member state languages’ which do not sit in the hierarchy but are still used in job adverts. These groups map to a set of competencies such as ‘French’, ‘Spanish’, ‘German’.
To develop our taxonomy, we analysed job adverts posted on SpaceCareers.uk between December 2015 and December 2019. SpaceCareers.uk is a British space jobs board operated by UKSEDS, the UK’s national student space society, which focuses on internships, graduate schemes, PhDs, postdoctoral fellowships, and other early careers opportunities. The cut-off criterion is that positions should ask for no more than three years of experience.
The initial dataset contained just under 1300 adverts. We cleaned this dataset by removing duplicate adverts, and excluding all adverts which were not for internships, graduate positions, or direct entry jobs. This left us with 812 adverts. The limitations of this dataset are discussed in the Limitations section.
We reviewed 104 adverts (~13% of total) by hand and tagged mentions of competencies such as ‘Python’ or ‘problem solving’, linking them to a taxonomy entry for the competency. For example, ‘communication and presentation skills’ and ‘written and verbal communication’ might both be linked to the taxonomic entry of ‘communication skills’. In this way we built up a library of natural language examples of competencies in our taxonomy.
We then compared this library to the entire dataset, identifying which competencies were mentioned in each job advert.
Where no competencies were identified within a job advert, we reviewed the advert manually and added any missing competencies.
We assessed the accuracy of our algorithm by manually checking an additional randomly selected 50 job adverts and identifying any tags that had been missed or added incorrectly by the tagging algorithm.
Across the 50 jobs there were 468 tags in 383 categories. We found that 5 (1.3%) of these categories were incorrect – for example an advert for an administrative role described the employer as an ‘electronics’ company, and the job was incorrectly classified as requiring knowledge of electronics. We also found that there were 30 tags (6.4%) that we would have applied but had not been by the algorithm – for example we would have tagged ‘autonomous and challenge-driven’ as an example of the skill of working independently.
1.0.1: Creative / innovative
1.0.4: Inquisitive / curious
1.0.5: Open-minded / willing to learn
1.0.6: Practical / hands on
1.0.8: Resourceful / proactive
1.0.9: Responsible / trustworthy
1.0.11: Interested in space
1.0.12: Willing to travel
2.1: Science & Engineering
2.1.1: Adhesives, bonding, soldering and fastening techniques required to meet space qualification standards.
2.1.2: Configuration and Document Management Control Processes including issue control, incorporation of change and End Item Data Pack.
2.1.4: Disciplines and handling in cleanliness and contamination-controlled environments.
2.1.5: Ground Support Equipment and Systems including electrical/electronic test equipment and mechanical handling equipment.
2.1.6: Imaging detectors
2.1.7: Launch vehicle design
2.1.8: Mechanical, Electrical and Electronic Analysis & Testing principles, including space industry-specific test standards.
2.1.9: RF/Microwave systems
2.1.10: Orbital Mechanics
2.1.11: Planetary science
2.1.12: Principles of Additive Manufacturing for application in space including powder quality and repeatability of build.
2.1.13: thermal-vacuum, electromagnetic compatibility, shock, vibration and acoustic testing.
2.1.14: Properties, handling and application of space qualified materials including Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) precautions.
2.1.15: Purpose of approved processes, components, parts and materials lists and verification control documentation.
2.1.16: Quality and Product Assurance principles
2.1.18: Space sector
22.214.171.124: Relationships between customers, partners & suppliers in the international space engineering and manufacturing sector.
2.1.19: Remote sensing
2.1.21: Satellite communication systems
2.1.22: Software Defined Radio (SDR)
2.1.23: AIT such as vibration, thermal-vacuum, electromagnetic compatibility.
2.1.24: Spacecraft operations
2.1.25: Spacecraft Systems
2.1.26: STEM Principles
126.96.36.199: Precision and uncertainty in measurement systems, including limitations and appropriate use.
2.1.27: The space environment including thermal, vacuum, radiation, atomic oxygen and launch operations.
2.1.28: Vacuum and pressurised systems and measurement.
2.1.29: Engineering Standards
2.1.30: Concurrent design
2.1.31: Knowledge of control systems
2.1.32: Knowledge of electronics
2.1.33: Knowledge of ESA
2.1.34: Knowledge of mechanical design
2.1.35: Knowledge of optics
2.1.36: Knowledge of science
2.1.37: Knowledge of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
2.1.38: Knowledge of tribology
2.1.39: Design of experiments
2.1.40: Principles of thermodynamics
2.2: Programming & Computer Science
2.2.1: Embedded programming
2.2.3: Networking, Ethernet
2.2.4: Software Standards
188.8.131.52: IoT protocols and standards
2.2.5: Image processing
2.2.6: Machine learning
2.4: Education & Outreach
2.4.2: Teaching experience
2.4.3: Knowledge of the national curriculum
2.4.4: Experience with children
2.5: Work Experience
2.5.1: Research environment experience
3: Technical Skill
3.1: Science & Engineering
3.1.1: Work in facilities such as cleanrooms, workshops and testing facilities
3.1.2: Assemble, integrate and test at equipment, subsystem and system level.
3.1.3: Electronics AIT
3.1.5: Contribute to technical reviews such as assembly, integration and test readiness, and non-conformance reviews.
3.1.6: Contribute to the definition of space engineering process improvement plans.
3.1.7: Design electronics
3.1.8: Do aerodynamic analysis (use CFD software)
3.1.9: Do flight analysis
3.1.10: Do structural analysis (use FEA software)
3.1.11: Do thermal analysis
3.1.12: Inspect electrical, mechanical or electronic equipment for quality assurance purposes.
3.1.13: Interpret outputs from manufacturing software such as Computer Aided Design (CAD) / Computer Aided Manufacture (CAM) and Product Data Management / Product Lifecycle Management (PDM/PLM)
3.1.14: Measure, test and analyse, using instruments such as pressure gauges, micrometers, balances and non-contact approaches.
3.1.15: Perform appropriate joining techniques
3.1.16: Perform electrical and electronic measurement and testing
3.1.17: Perform spectroscopy
3.1.18: Prepare and complete documentation and specifications
3.1.19: Support and maintain ground support systems for spacecraft and subsystems.
3.1.20: Use and maintain cryogenic systems for space applications
3.1.21: Use and maintain vacuum and pressure systems for space applications (such as environmental test chambers, pressure-fed propulsion systems, and gas supply lines for manufacturing & testing) including associated processes and documentation such as Piping & Instrumentation Diagrams.
3.1.22: Use CAD software
184.108.40.206: Siemens NX
220.127.116.11: Autodesk Inventor
3.1.23: Use GIS software
18.104.22.168: PCI Geomatica
3.1.24: Use internal and external Quality Management Systems
3.1.25: Use CAE software
3.1.26: Conduct practical engineering activities safely
3.1.27: Laboratory skills
3.1.28: Perform research
3.1.29: Design mechanical parts
3.1.30: Interpret specifications
3.2: Programming & Computer Science
3.2.1: Process and analyse data
22.214.171.124: Geospatial data
126.96.36.199.1: GNSS data
188.8.131.52.2: Satellite imagery
3.2.3: Design, develop, and deploy software
184.108.40.206: Visual Basic
3.2.4: Use cloud computing platforms
3.2.5: Design and use databases
220.127.116.11: Microsoft SQL Server
3.2.6: Use version control systems
3.2.7: Data collection
3.2.8: Front-end development
3.3: Creative design
3.3.1: GUI design
3.3.2: Use creative software
18.104.22.168: Adobe CC
3.3.4: Illustration skills
3.4: Marketing & PR
3.4.1: Social media
22.214.171.124: Press releases
3.6: Education & Outreach
3.6.1: Deliver planetarium shows
3.6.2: Teaching and lecturing
3.7.1: Use accounting software
3.8: Astronomy photography
3.9: Business development
4: Transferable Skill
4.0: Transferable Skill
4.0.1: Analytical skills
4.0.2: Attention to detail
4.0.3: Communication skills
126.96.36.199: Communicate verbally
188.8.131.52.1: Presenting / Public speaking
184.108.40.206.1: Technical report writing
4.0.4: Interpersonal skills
220.127.116.11: Be polite
18.104.22.168: Work in a team
22.214.171.124: Customer/partner relationships
126.96.36.199: Negotiate and influence
188.8.131.52: Lead a team
4.0.5: IT skills
184.108.40.206: Eclipse software
220.127.116.11: MS Office
18.104.22.168: CRM system
22.214.171.124: ERP system
126.96.36.199: Operating systems
188.8.131.52.3: OS X
184.108.40.206: Using databases
220.127.116.11: Project management software
18.104.22.168.1: MS Project
4.0.6: Planning & organisation
22.214.171.124: Event planning
126.96.36.199: Process management
4.0.7: Problem solve
4.0.8: Time management skills
4.0.9: Work independently
4.0.10: Work under pressure
4.0.11: Administer First Aid
4.0.12: Conduct risk assessments
4.0.13: Coach/mentor someone
4.0.14: Keep records
4.0.15: Manual dexterity
4.0.16: Numerical skills
4.0.17: Calm in a crisis
4.0.18: Follow health and safety guidelines
188.8.131.52: Driving license
5.0.2: Project management
5.1: Science & Engineering
5.1.1: Spacecraft Control
184.108.40.206: CAT2 Spacecraft Controller
The taxonomy we present here is a work in progress and is not yet comprehensive. We will continue to develop it as we conduct further research into the workforce needs of the sector.
Most importantly, we want to improve its coverage. There are undoubtedly many skills that are missing because they did not appear in the jobs we analysed to produce the taxonomy. Analysing more jobs, particularly from other datasets will help to ensure that the taxonomy is a good representation of the skills needed across the sector.
We also intend to add definitions to each of the competencies identified in our taxonomy, creating a resource for the space sector which supports the process of recruitment, and facilitates upskilling and reskilling. Our goal is to have a common vocabulary for alignment between education providers, employers, and employees, and a common frame of reference against which we can measure demand for competencies, what competencies the space workforce already has, and the impact that new training courses might have.
We recognise that there are many other relevant taxonomies with which our work overlaps, and we want to identify and map these links so that the different taxonomies can be used together and do not needlessly duplicate each other.
Early careers bias
The SCUK dataset is made up of adverts for early career space jobs. The competencies demanded for early career jobs may be different from the demand across the sector more generally. In future work we will look at wider datasets to examine this in more detail.
Inclusion of non-UK jobs
Though we present our analysis as being an assessment of skills demand in the UK space sector, about 30% of the jobs in the SCUK dataset are based outside of the UK. Of these, most (28%) are based in Europe, primarily Germany (10%) and the Netherlands (4%).
SpaceCareers.uk advertised these roles as they were open to British nationals, and we include them as many relate to work in which the UK is closely involved, or to agencies such as ESA of which the UK is a member country.
There is no indication that the demands of the European space sector are significantly different from those of the UK’s, and many of these roles may need to be duplicated in the UK after Brexit if the UK develops replacement for EU programmes such as Galileo 9.
UK regional bias
The SCUK dataset has a significant bias toward companies in the South East of England and Scotland at the expense of London, the South West, and the East of England compared to data from the UK Space Agency’s Size and Health report 1d.
(% of jobs)
|S& H 2018|
(% of employees)
|Yorkshire and the Humber||0.3||3.1|
|East of England||5.7||10.5|
|Other (includes jobs with no fixed location)||5.2||0|
It is not clear why this is the case, but as a result care should be taken when considering our findings in a regional context. We have chosen not to segment our results by region because the sample size for some regions is too small to be a useful indication of demand in those regions.
The SCUK dataset is significantly biased toward upstream companies compared to data from the UK Space Agency’s Size and Health report 1b.
% of jobs
|S& H 2018|
% of jobs
It is not clear why this is the case. One possibility is that upstream companies tend to be larger with well developed internship programmes and graduate intakes, while downstream companies tend to be smaller and less able to take on a large number of early career employees. Additionally, the Space Placements in Industry (SPIN) programme which places a large number of undergraduate and postgraduate students in primarily downstream summer internships is only represented in the SCUK data only as a single post per year and not as multiple individual posts.
As a result, where there is a significant variation between upstream and downstream demand for a competency (such as for data analysis skills), the ‘all jobs’ figure should not be considered an accurate picture of sector-wide demand, and instead demand should be looked at on a sector-specific basis.
Individual job bias
SpaceCareers.uk cautioned that some schemes with large numbers of openings – for example the ESA Young Graduate Trainee Programme – are represented by only a single advert per year.
Omission of niche skills
Our approach to developing the taxonomy means that certain niche skills that are demanded for only a few jobs, but are nonetheless important to the sector, may have been omitted. We intend for the taxonomy to be a living database that is continuously improved upon, and hope to include any omitted skills in future iterations.
We are grateful to UKSEDS for sharing their data from SpaceCareers.uk, without which this work would not have been possible. We would also like to extend a special thank you to Portia Bowman and Rob Garner for their advice and ideas, to James Telfer and Jacob Smith for proofing this paper, to our advisors Ed Chester, Julia Hunter-Anderson, and Sheila Kanani, and to Nigel Bannister and Roy Haworth for their suggestions and support in developing the competency taxonomy.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You can copy, redistribute, and adapt what we’ve presented for any non-commercial purpose. However, you must give us credit and link back to this page. If you want to use it in a commercial context, get in touch with us.
- Sadlier, G. et al. (2019). The Size and Health of the UK Space Industry 2018, a: p. 10, b: pp. 16–17, c: p. 19, d: p. 22. London Economics.
- Space IGS (2010). A UK Space Innovation and Growth Strategy 2010 to 2030, p. 10.
- Space IGS (2014). Space Innovation and Growth Strategy 2014 – 2030: Skills Theme Report.
- Neave, S. et al. (2018). Engineering UK 2018: The state of engineering, p. 225. Engineering UK.
- CBI (2014). Time well spent: embedding employability in work experience.
- Cabinet Office (2019). Success Profiles.
- The Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues (2017). A Framework for Character Education in Schools.
- Department for Education (2019). Character Education: Framework Guidance.
- Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (2019). Satellites and space programmes from 1 January 2021.